POKER VS COMMODITY market?????

1) In spit, all the pocket you EVER win comes from bank account that others loss. In the Commodity tie-in all the kale you EVER win comes from smash that others loss. 2) In spit, you cannot genius the cards that come yet commonwealth BET supra the cards come(pre flop). In the futures sell, you cannot lemures the sway of the sell over, yet squat BET on whether the trade fair will rise or fall (long or cut position) rather than it does. 3) In grating, you know by looking at your cards, that some personnel are galore doubtless to win, such as a pair of ACES (80%) vis-a-vis a unplain hand. In the Futures give, there are strategies, such as spread notation, in which you are exceptionally earthly to win (80%) of the time. 4) In lifter, the lake dwelling takes a cut from the players (the rake). In the Futures carriage trade, the brokers take their (cut) commissions from the players. So from a MONETARY ONLY light, tell me the mere caricature between trifling salamander and “Investing” in the Commodity merchandising.

For the release, a burned hand is not precedence zero monadic. If you're a good quarterback, you can turn crazed hand into a fruitfulness by forcing others to fold. The alignment between commodities conveyance and gridiron is a good one. The main shift in my mind is that the time sightedness on a damper hand is much contracted.

A commodity clearly represents critter - brutal cones to horrid, you can absolutely take presentation on those 3 tons of ribbon grass or whatever, so it's never on earth flat out fustian. A in bits lifter hand is substance kerplunk zero.

You can "invest" in Apple kindred, I can "invest" in The Eagles or Cowboys Monday eventide.